[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: squeeze amavisd-new requires updated pax.. add to backports?



On 05/31/2011 10:21 PM, John Clements wrote:
A search of the debian-backports mailing lists generates no hits for "pax", hope this isn't a known issue...

The version of 'pax' associated with squeeze appears to be broken for all .tar files:

clements@computer:/tmp$ cat>  foo
oseutheth
clements@computer:/tmp$ tar cvf foo.tar foo
foo
clements@computer:/tmp$ pax -v<  foo.tar
-rw-r--r--  1 clements clements 4294967306 May 31 13:16 foo
pax: ustar vol 1, 1 files, 10240 bytes read, 13814518390877841716 bytes written.

... that is, it reports a size of (very large integer) for a tar file containing only one file of about 10 chars. This, in turn, means that the mail filter amavisd-new chokes on all .tar files that it receives.

The updated version of pax (1:20090728-2) does not exhibit this behavior on my machine (debian squeeze, i686), and it appears to me that adding the updated version to either squeeze-backports or to squeeeze itself would be a good idea.

Cheers!

John Clements

Hi John.

I also think backporting pax would be a good idea.

Maybe the issue is the same as reported on bug #317466 as apparently, your foo.tar weighs 4GB.

Thanks.


Reply to: