Re: Accepted redmine 1.1.2-2~bpo60+1 (source all)

[Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>]

micah anderson schrieb am Friday, den 27. May 2011:

> 
> Hi Jan,
> 
> On Fri, 27 May 2011 21:11:53 +0200, Jan Wagner <waja@cyconet.org> wrote:
> > Hi Micah,
> > 
> > On Freitag 27 Mai 2011, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > > Format: 1.8
> > > Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:35:00 -0400
> > > Source: redmine
> > > Binary: redmine redmine-mysql redmine-pgsql redmine-sqlite
> > > Architecture: source all
> > > Version: 1.1.2-2~bpo60+1
> > > Distribution: squeeze-backports
> > > Urgency: low
> > > Maintainer: Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org>
> > > Changed-By: Micah Anderson <micah@debian.org>
> > > Description:
> > >  redmine    - flexible project management web application
> > >  redmine-mysql - metapackage providing MySQL dependencies for Redmine
> > >  redmine-pgsql - metapackage providing PostgreSQL dependencies for Redmine
> > >  redmine-sqlite - metapackage providing sqlite dependencies for Redmine
> > > Closes: 566859 594853 597649 597652 598605 599943 620911
> > > Changes:
> > >  redmine (1.1.2-2~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low
> > 
> > I'm a bit surprized about this upload. Indeed, I shoudl have updated the 
> > package, but I had expected a short mail about the issue.
> 
> This upload was to squeeze-backports, it wasn't an update of the
> existing package in the main archive. 
and? hijacking packages in backports is also not nice (there were several mails
about this topic on this list). 

Please don't hijack backports!

Alex