Re: BinNMUing squeeze in squeeze-backports?
2011/6/24 Julien Cristau <julien@cristau.org>:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 16:24:49 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> This means plymouth becomes uninstallable, since it depends on the
>> former. BinNMUing makes it build successfully against the latter. That
>> was done in unstable already, I guess it's 1. feasible, and 2. wanted to
>> do so in squeeze-backports as well, so that plymouth is installable along
>> new libdrm. Thoughts?
>>
> I don't think it's reasonable/feasible. backports.d.o doesn't carry the
> source for that package, so you'd need a source upload.
Ha. So, binNMU in backports of packages from squeeze are not possible
before a source-full upload in backports... Damn, I just wanted to ask
for that for the various ocaml packages..
R.
Reply to: