[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lxde package is broken



Hi Andres, (hi list),

Thanks for reporting the result.

I am not quite sure what was wrong there. Let's cc on the mailing list
to have more help here.

I've tried to bootstrap a clean chroot with lxde installed to test that.
I found I need to use 'aptitude full-upgrade -t lenny-backports' to be
able upgrade lxde from lenny-backports.

Kindly regards,

-Andrew

Andres Cimmarusti wrote:
> Yes they are in the backports repo, but for some reason beyond me,
> aptitutde didn't fetch them automatically and just complained. So I had
> to install them separately and then I installed lxde without problems.
> 
> Andres
> 
> 2010/2/19 Andrew Lee <ajqlee@debian.org <mailto:ajqlee@debian.org>>
> 
>     Hi Andres,
> 
>     Thanks for reporting this issue.
> 
>     I am not sure if I made some mistakes to lxpanel and lxsession packages?
> 
>     The two packages have build-depends aginst to the backported version of
>     libfontconfig1 (>= 2.8.0), libasound2 (> 1.0.18), libfontconfig1 (>=
>     2.8.0) and libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.16.0).
> 
>     Could you please check if the version of these packages are also in your
>     backports.org <http://backports.org> repo?
> 
>     Thanks for your help,
> 
>     -Andrew
> 
>     Andres Cimmarusti wrote:
>     > I'm now trying to upgrade to the newer lxde backports, but there are
>     > dependency problems (it's two packages that have trouble lxpanel
>     > lxsessionl, I believe all the required packages are in backports, but
>     > it's necessary to make apt aware of this):
>     >
>     > # aptitude full-upgrade
>     > Reading package lists... Done
>     > Building dependency tree
>     > Reading state information... Done
>     > Reading extended state information
>     > Initializing package states... Done
>     > Reading task descriptions... Done
>     > The following packages are BROKEN:
>     >   lxpanel lxsession
>     > The following NEW packages will be installed:
>     >   manpages-dev{a}
>     > The following packages will be upgraded:
>     >   lxde-common lxde-core
>     > 4 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not
>     upgraded.
>     > Need to get 2778kB of archives. After unpacking 4600kB will be freed.
>     > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>     >   lxsession: Depends: libfontconfig1 (>= 2.8.0) but 2.6.0-3 is
>     installed.
>     >   lxpanel: Depends: libasound2 (> 1.0.18) but 1.0.16-2 is installed.
>     >            Depends: libfontconfig1 (>= 2.8.0) but 2.6.0-3 is
>     installed.
>     >            Depends: libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.16.0) but 2.12.12-1~lenny1 is
>     > installed.
>     > The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
>     >
>     > Keep the following packages at their current version:
>     > lxde-common [0.4.2-3~bpo50+1 (now)]
>     > lxde-core [0.4.2-3~bpo50+1 (now)]
>     > lxpanel [0.4.1+svn20090524-2~bpo50+1 (now)]
>     > lxsession [0.4.0+svn20090905-1~bpo50+1 (now)]
>     >
>     >
>     > 2010/2/8 Andrew Lee <ajqlee@debian.org <mailto:ajqlee@debian.org>
>     <mailto:ajqlee@debian.org <mailto:ajqlee@debian.org>>>
>     >
>     >     Thanks for the reminder,
>     >
>     >     I'd like to backport lxde-common 0.5.0-2 which already moved
>     lxmusic as
>     >     Recommends to solve this issue.
>     >
>     >     I've upload lxde-icon-theme into NEW, please accept them if no
>     problem
>     >     in the package.
>     >
>     >     The lxde-common is building, and would be uploaded shortly.
>     >
>     >     Cheers,
>     >
>     >     -Andrew
>     >
>     >
>     >     Andres Cimmarusti wrote:
>     >     > Yes, I already pointed this out, but received little attention.
>     >     > You can, however, install lxde from backports without problem
>     >     installing
>     >     > all lxde packages in backports except the meta-package lxde
>     >     >
>     >     > 2010/2/6 sia Sia <sia@gmx.us <mailto:sia@gmx.us>
>     <mailto:sia@gmx.us <mailto:sia@gmx.us>>
>     >     <mailto:sia@gmx.us <mailto:sia@gmx.us> <mailto:sia@gmx.us
>     <mailto:sia@gmx.us>>>>
>     >     >
>     >     >     hi,
>     >     >
>     >     >     the lxde package is brocken in your backports:
>     >     >
>     >     >     ########################################################
>     >     >
>     >     >     aptitude -t lenny-backports install lxde
>     >     >     Reading package lists... Done
>     >     >     Building dependency tree
>     >     >     Reading state information... Done
>     >     >     Reading extended state information
>     >     >     Initializing package states... Done
>     >     >
>     >     >     Reading task descriptions... Done
>     >     >     The following packages are BROKEN:
>     >     >       lxde
>     >     >     The following NEW packages will be installed:
>     >     >       lxinput{a}
>     >     >     1 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and
>     27 not
>     >     upgraded.
>     >     >
>     >     >     Need to get 43,1kB of archives. After unpacking 602kB
>     will be
>     >     used.
>     >     >     The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>     >     >       lxde: Depends: lxmusic which is a virtual package.
>     >     >     The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >     Keep the following packages at their current version:
>     >     >     lxde [0.3.2.1+svn20080509-5 (stable, now)]
>     >     >
>     >     >     Score is -9880
>     >     >
>     >     >     Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] n
>     >     >     The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >     Remove the following packages:
>     >     >     lxde
>     >     >
>     >     >     Score is -9881
>     >     >
>     >     >     Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] n
>     >     >
>     >     >     *** No more solutions available ***
>     >     >
>     >     >     ########################################################
>     >     >
>     >     >     but other package like pidgin and iceweasel or nm-applet
>     >     worked very
>     >     >     fine.
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >     best regards
>     >     >
>     >     >     Sia
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
> 
> 



Reply to: