[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bacula 2.4.3 packages



Hi,

On 2008-12-01 08:21, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > > > any plans to update the bacula packages to version 2.4.3?
> > > > 2.4.3 is available in unstable now:
> > > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bacula.html
> > >
> > > Unstable is uninteristing for bpo. 
> > > We only include versions from testing. 
> > 
> > Ah, I remember. That means now that lenny is frozen there will be
> > no
> > bacula update soon?
> 
>  I still have my preparation directories sitting on my website, so
>  bacula 2.4.3 is available from there:
>  <http://rhonda.deb.at/debian/bpo/bacula/>


thanks for the link.

 
>  I have no idea if it will make it into lenny (and thus into etch
>  backports) at some time, so upgradeability might be an issue. I
>  though propably will continue with backporting bacula once lenny
>  was released, though to lenny-backports, of course.
> 
>  Yes, the binaries are only for powerpc, and it's not apt-getable.
>  The latter part is on intention, about the former I will propably
>  eventually produce i386 binaries, but that might take a while.

I need to build bacula on amd64. I'm not very familiar with building
packages from source. In the end I was successfull, but I'm not sure
if it was the correct way to do it ;)

Building the traymon was the problem. I'm not sure what I did to avoid
the problem, I found this note in the diff file.

- Don't build traymon because it would require gtk 2.10, thanks to waldi for
noticing it.


I would be interested what I have to do to exclude the traymon in the
right way. Besides this I just took the Build-Depends from the
backports bacula 2.4.2 dsc file.

If you could give me a hint how to build bacula from source I would
build my own backport packages.


Ralf

Reply to: