Re: Icedove and Iceweasel 2.0.0.x in Backports

[Michael C <sieverfrisch@yahoo.ie>]

Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 06:25:12PM +0000, Michael C wrote:
>   
> > Now that Iceweasel 2.0.0.12 and Icedove 2.0.0.9 are in Lenny, is there
> > any prospect of them being backported?
> >
> >     
> Why would it need to be backported?  It is already in Etch in main:
>
> roberto@miami:~$ apt-cache policy iceweasel |head -2
> iceweasel:
>   Installed: 2.0.0.12-0etch1
>   

D'oh! Blame it on the reckless over-eagerness of a would-be Fedora
escapee...