Re: approx for amd64

To: Jason Lunz <lunz@falooley.org>
Cc: backports-users@lists.backports.org
Subject: Re: approx for amd64
From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@ganneff.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:15:03 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87myolo19k.fsf@delenn.ganneff.de>
Mail-followup-to: Jason Lunz <lunz@falooley.org>, backports-users@lists.backports.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] fsb7pt$1t1$1@ger.gmane.org> (Jason Lunz's message of "Tue\, 25 Mar 2008 16\:04\:13 +0000 $UTC$")
References: <[🔎] fsb7pt$1t1$1@ger.gmane.org>

On 11335 March 1977, Jason Lunz wrote:

> Is there any reason why the approx backport exists for i386 and not
> amd64?

The amd64 buildd used for bpo was down until yesterday, thanks to a
harddisc failure.

-- 
bye, Joerg
<Getty> LOL die Telefonnummer vom Arbeitsamt MÃ¶nchengladbach ist echt 404-0?
<Getty> Soll das nen schlechter Scherz sein?

Reply to:

References:
- approx for amd64
  - From: Jason Lunz <lunz@falooley.org>

Prev by Date: cups 1.3.6 backport
Next by Date: Icedove and Iceweasel 2.0.0.x in Backports
Previous by thread: approx for amd64
Next by thread: bug
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread