[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Incorrect Lighttpd version/package



Sebastian Harl schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. January 2008:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:26:30PM -0500, Chris Henning wrote:
> > Hi, I have installed Lighttpd from etch-backports:
> > 
> > root@lucidchat:~# apt-cache policy lighttpd
> > lighttpd:
> >  Installed: 1.4.18-2~bpo40+1
> >  Candidate: 1.4.18-2~bpo40+1
> >  Version table:
> > *** 1.4.18-2~bpo40+1 0
> >        625 http://www.backports.org etch-backports/main Packages
> >        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> >     1.4.13-4etch4 0
> >        650 http://ftp.us.debian.org etch/main Packages
> >        650 http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages
> > 
> > But it seems that either the version number on the package is wrong, or 
> > the wrong version was compiled and put into etch-backports.  Lighty's 
> > server config page[1] says 1.4.16.  And there's a 1.4.16 specific bug[2] 
> > that I see on another installation. 
> 
> It looks like this is seriously broken. According to the changelog this is a
> backport of some unreleased 1.4.18-2 package which did not even show up in
> unstable yet. Additionally, there is no .diff.gz available on bpo but the
> package has been build as native package.
> 
> Pierre, could you please fix that and be more careful the next time you upload
> a package? TIA.
uargl. I will remove this backport soon. I really hope that this is not the
version I approved. Ahh puuh. Its not. 

Alex


Reply to: