On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 05:07:33PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: > On So, 17 Aug 2008, Erik Mouw wrote: > > and hence remove any TeX support. If you then install texlive-base-bin > > from bpo, you can't install texlive-latex-base because that is not yet > > backported. I guess the best solution is to backport at least the > > I disagree, the guidelines from bpo say that if a package can be > installed from testing using pinning then it should not be backported. I > have done the backport only of telxive-bin, since the other texlive > packages can and should be taken from testing. Right now it is impossible to install tetex with a standard etch+bpo installation because tetex depends on an older version of tex-common. > > texlive LaTeX parts as the alternative would be to remove texlive from > > That would be a bad move. > > If you want to stay with texlive 2005 (or tetex) why did you install the > tex-common from bpo? I tried to force install tex-common, that usually solves dependency problems that apt can't handle. Erik -- Erik Mouw -- mouw@nl.linux.org GPG key fingerprint: D6AC 7F15 A26E C5C4 62E0 4A58 FCF9 551C 9B48 B68D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature