[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New policy for backports.org

Anthony DeRobertis schrieb am Donnerstag, den 23. August 2007:

> On 08/23/2007 09:57 AM, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> >
> >Imho, the policy should also contain information about how to handle
> >oldstable-bpo. IIrc, the following rules have been agreed upon:
> >  
> Last stuff I could find in the archive is:
> http://lists.backports.org/lurker-bpo/message/20070509.073410.771a332d.en.html
> http://lists.backports.org/lurker-bpo/message/20070509.095642.1db78b28.en.html
> http://lists.backports.org/lurker-bpo/message/20070625.173317.c42a77f1.en.html
> So, the current policy seems to be that its frozen and nothing but 
> security updates should go in, pending some archive change.
I'm sorry I missed that point, I will enhance the policy about the things
sebastian harl sid. Sarge-bpo is free again, but take sure that the version
in etch-bpo or etch  is bigger than in sarge-bpo. For a version in sarge-bpo
that is bigger than in etch that means you have to provide a backport for
etch-bpo too. 


Reply to: