Re: not later than in testing
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Keith Edmunds wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2007 09:49:46 +0200
> Alexander Wirt <email@example.com> wrote:
> > we
> > also decided to allow versions from lenny into sarge-bpo, otherwise it
> > would be pretty useless.
> I disagree that it would be 'useless'.
> Could someone who supports the idea of post-Etch packages being present in
> sarge-backports please explain how to upgrade a system (that contains such
> packages) to etch?
May I ask a newbie question? What lines would/should I add to my
sources.lst(sp?) for my Gateway 500 running sarge?