Re: Accepted clamav 0.90.1-2~bpo.1 (source i386 all)
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Does that package version makes sense to upload?
> Volatile for Sarge already has clamav 0.90.2
> (0.90.2-0volatile1). Doesn't have volatile more strict requirements
> than bpo?
this package is an upgrade for people who are not using volatile/sarge
> And clamav 0.90.1 has some known security issues (CVE-2007-1745,
> CVE-2007-1997, https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=459)
but this is clamav 0.90.2.
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist