Re: patch to backport cmake

["Mehul N. Sanghvi" <mehul.sanghvi@gmail.com>]

Daniel Baumann said the following on 9/12/2006 4:06 AM:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > He did backport cmake by reverting the cmake package to a lower
> > debhelper version which is something one should not do. Instead, one
> > should use the debhelper backport, this results in less intrusive and
> > less error-prone.
>
> s/prone/prone backport./


What does one do when the back ported debhelper is older then what is needed by 
a packages ?  xulrunner depends on a debhelper version that is higher then what 
is in backports currently.

BTW, I'm new to doing backports.

cheers,

    mehul


--
Mehul N. Sanghvi
email: mehul.sanghvi@gmail.com