also sprach Norbert Tretkowski <norbert@tretkowski.de> [2006.11.03.2354 +0100]:
> If you're sure it will enter testing, yes.
Ah, good point. We would not want 1.2.50~bpo1 in bpo and only 1.2.49
in etch.
I guess noone can be sure of anything these days. :)
I know I'll get mdadm 2.5.5-1 into etch, but then again that package
needs some more testing for sarge.
So thanks, question answered; I'll hold.
People who want logcheck:
http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/sarge-backports/main/binary-all/admin/
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net
"the good thing about standards is
that there are so many to choose from."
-- andrew s. tanenbaum
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)