[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted polyphone 2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-2~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports->backports-policy, buster-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA384

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 16:27:14 +0200
Source: polyphone
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-2~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Changes:
 polyphone (2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-2~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for buster-backports.
   * Drop debian/README.Debian, the fix is included in 10.9
   * Remaining changes against bullseye:
     - Build-Depends libstk-dev → libstk0-dev
     - update VCS-* branch
     - re-enable -Wl,--as-needed
     - qtchooser, still used here, needs QT_SELECT=5 exported
 .
 polyphone (2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add patch to fix large soundfonts/samples’ offsets
Checksums-Sha1:
 c1f1223fff07920e12f31ffba03846aaa6a613dc 2584 polyphone_2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-2~bpo10+1.dsc
 7fbeffdcedc956aba814274555e60d5007028080 14100 polyphone_2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 07556013af165404106911f9a610106958ba8429d12ca83c6feddeb0a930f2fa 2584 polyphone_2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-2~bpo10+1.dsc
 a981f5aee0e50c922d31abc0639baafe9324b4b286622018dc02be280e06d6f6 14100 polyphone_2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 1da30679103132664db14e504322ae70 2584 sound optional polyphone_2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-2~bpo10+1.dsc
 81b7f070bfec808ae97cf1738cdb25dd 14100 sound optional polyphone_2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (MirBSD)
Comment: ☃ ЦΤℱ—8 ☕☂☄
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=9b+Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: