Accepted tomb 2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 18:22:26 +0100
Source: tomb
Architecture: source
Version: 2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Security Tools <team+pkg-security@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sven Geuer <debmaint@g-e-u-e-r.de>
Changes:
tomb (2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for buster-backports; no changes necessary.
.
tomb (2.9+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
- Adapt d/patches/* to new release.
- Add btrfs-progs as Suggests dependency.
* Update d/t/*
- Rename d/t/test1 to d/t/create-and-use-a-tomb.
- Extend test to use ext4 and btrfs as the tomb's file system.
* Introduce d/NEWS.
* Update d/copyright.
Checksums-Sha1:
63794bbac2f6ebfff0696eff1757616013bd7df7 2101 tomb_2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1.dsc
20e08167007f5f8d83d880db535a4f0995c6ede1 7288 tomb_2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
7718bd3b56401a8deba7e6a659e2d59dfb6fa040 5598 tomb_2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
7b7a4fc205503595c2a3bbf2477be728228bca5393528e1aba0b7511032a91bd 2101 tomb_2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1.dsc
fd87cce6923eaffc82195bf3c2bfb8450b3f284f7b0bb7f9b5d74ded68d1debf 7288 tomb_2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
74f944435b3478480ed37719039be523f2248426cb83ed0e470dba1b81225a57 5598 tomb_2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
3345e59edb43df35223a35133c6c0c6b 2101 utils optional tomb_2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1.dsc
fb2e84391852d05de735ed667e3ac732 7288 utils optional tomb_2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
26f3e2faf797e3d17dd7d68e5beab839 5598 utils optional tomb_2.9+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=MCoq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: