[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted haproxy 2.2.6-1~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:20:10 +0100
Source: haproxy
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.6-1~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian HAProxy Maintainers <team+haproxy@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org>
Changes:
 haproxy (2.2.6-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for buster-backports.
Checksums-Sha1:
 c7129323e462076cfc2a8a5d97dab37025848b32 2340 haproxy_2.2.6-1~bpo10+1.dsc
 530c4883a1297ec21750d4ed2383e4f75a6ee20f 2890554 haproxy_2.2.6.orig.tar.gz
 c2cf08561e7bb80ab59b68e48cf671e349df74d2 71824 haproxy_2.2.6-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 1a4cf6727d6950df711a96b7e51a563f6324dc8b 8210 haproxy_2.2.6-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 7e6c8b632f1ce798b9a833ced4df25ff3be521041c883bc76ac24d188c37837e 2340 haproxy_2.2.6-1~bpo10+1.dsc
 be1c6754cbaceafc4837e0c6036c7f81027a3992516435cbbbc5dc749bf5a087 2890554 haproxy_2.2.6.orig.tar.gz
 3eb9b9705932d553a6500a06ea04401fa4dceff2b5ccc475ccc03bce494d2a44 71824 haproxy_2.2.6-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 c065c1a580d01164b705c6ed54923e0f031642fe751898a4ba2b1ed5dc7f07e3 8210 haproxy_2.2.6-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 5c1904d0650cf65985700afbba9b5637 2340 net optional haproxy_2.2.6-1~bpo10+1.dsc
 94dc550517b5e1583b910a31b179ec89 2890554 net optional haproxy_2.2.6.orig.tar.gz
 96b477eaeeb498abd8587e5346eabb49 71824 net optional haproxy_2.2.6-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 930b367cc8c2dd314bdaabe8ccf36579 8210 net optional haproxy_2.2.6-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=amlv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: