[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted wireguard-linux-compat 1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA384

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 19:26:21 -0400
Source: wireguard-linux-compat
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Changed-By: Unit 193 <unit193@debian.org>
Changes:
 wireguard-linux-compat (1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for buster-backports.
 .
 wireguard-linux-compat (1.0.20200908-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
     - Refresh patch.
Checksums-Sha1:
 c504047e651781d1b337c9019d4b13c0e31ca219 2211 wireguard-linux-compat_1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1.dsc
 48da9a84c3fd1c0176ec29341d4c640c3ad1deed 13116 wireguard-linux-compat_1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 1bdb2ddad703a7ac8c24ddfa13214bc96000f0bd 5760 wireguard-linux-compat_1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 d838001a46a6f50a1aba9844913d673b7bb4b30ba901b83a6cb6238fe8350be2 2211 wireguard-linux-compat_1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1.dsc
 8ec9f5bf24f7e06785d9c5ccc3c519bf99106e8ad8c1bd7e1a5366a540f7a2d9 13116 wireguard-linux-compat_1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 b64f910cd3c8aa44c79916878ccc3acdfffccaf79ebb524daa76b13a33be6b3b 5760 wireguard-linux-compat_1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 9bd1de6a828980e1fe6e6cb6cd1c2d73 2211 net optional wireguard-linux-compat_1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1.dsc
 6deab2cde0be6dcc1e0e98e5b483b18f 13116 net optional wireguard-linux-compat_1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 12ae6d39c619eb9832de6380480c7a08 5760 net optional wireguard-linux-compat_1.0.20200908-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCQAdFiEEjbPlhoZdK0orGFpcUAHhsJqjdEsFAl9hTu4ACgkQUAHhsJqj
dEvacQ//YRFOCRStPtakFf+1pNil3OhWvW17ADnDDKlYG2oTWsWGye9jS+/ep7qC
7UO8B+u1y3KVLSkQXpnE0o+akdAA/taiiNqAD5xR8/tcLH6bHJY+NakEAGccNWHm
UmdynTWXKXRVTDphUyv8tDCkMA68RV5NgVwxU3DbzA+uljrw0k+GZ+zX0JG9yn7o
XzeCewFqTdi2P6/eR2K6v1SX9+Yn69mcjMNV2uMzQ2zPFOUF4p1Cj2S/KZfFEB7+
0IOTo9/iyTlZds7T/bpzWdjRzi4CjsKVIK5k1hIv9EZ9bp1NLO+j0EPsCwzMvPyU
bmE8FlosacKC9bGF3B1Ur7us62ta1R4FojojY9xO2gzq7E3YgeRj8vmOjUglqIog
6HuySQ1p1lWutJsukShBe+lvfbkUmKLzKt+OH2ggPI1eklDtoavyIsyFt9FOJgFS
dptKwB6kTYvTEAHM665WSRopK06unV/aVGnKKadf1Y8oJXOdgrzbRzWx6Bg5l+kt
zVGV2w2oaCWZV1RT5UAYfgXICryMfEcywkZA5feF7iP0w5chNmTdqSj9P5w7T3Z0
KC1cHtdfGKB+LpyyF6xuZIgqVv/pomreyNOP4gFMj2ifkWP1jUGhZfVIynvl5ox2
54l0Cgm9Mh8Kt1VgVPJo0LaLj9ECymTamxEJLvS06/1ehvNe5lk=
=SbLV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: