[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted josm 0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:40:55 +0100
Source: josm
Architecture: source
Version: 0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@debian.org>
Changes:
 josm (0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for buster-backports.
 .
 josm (0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New hotfix tested snapshot.
 .
 josm (0.0.svn15625+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New tested snapshot.
   * Drop Name field from upstream metadata.
   * Use `mv -v` in get-orig-source target.
Checksums-Sha1:
 6efc38b548934e5b8686c97efa6a4b1b9d76d334 2412 josm_0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.dsc
 2e7bdc6f67737bf4b7b194643a095154fd4f9720 97612 josm_0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 d1a71edca3d7e916031d6d8d68f5bf0b516708b2 12923 josm_0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 1032a0d0837cab4256b873c151c63d99b470f9f57503b8859680a65837d3ec33 2412 josm_0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.dsc
 8ed86e80f4b08b4117c3411436bd8862c38c0ac0d92858afc49d1c08306dbd9b 97612 josm_0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 981558f6f2b7ba70883849e056afc1cb50623635a108c5cdab2eff2570339fbf 12923 josm_0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 eb0fb40f085244c6cd7841a0228857ee 2412 utils optional josm_0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.dsc
 0e33d68625f6be66048f4e9b5daeb5dd 97612 utils optional josm_0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
 d4eb279ab637214e1cead5529c7098d0 12923 utils optional josm_0.0.svn15628+dfsg-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0o92
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: