Accepted mailscripts 0.16-1~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:43:21 -0700
Source: mailscripts
Architecture: source
Version: 0.16-1~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Changed-By: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Closes: 945195 945451
Changes:
mailscripts (0.16-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for buster-backports.
* Drop python3-pgpy build-dep and override_dh_auto_test to do nothing.
.
mailscripts (0.16-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
email-print-mime-structure:
* Add a test suite (Closes: #945451).
- Add <!nocheck> builddeps on
+ python3
+ python3-pgpy
+ gpg
+ gpg-agent
+ mypy.
* Add capability to decrypt S/MIME-encrypted messages (Closes: #945195).
- Add gpgsm, openssl to Build-Depends and Suggests.
- Add <!nocheck> build-dep on dirmngr.
* Add capability to handle one-part PKCS#7 signature objects.
- Add gnutls-bin to Build-Depends and Suggests.
* Fully decode encrypted parts before passing to any decryption
mechanism.
See <https://bugs.debian.org/945195#100>.
.
Thanks to Daniel Kahn Gillmor for two patch series implementing these
improvements.
Checksums-Sha1:
9bcc6b8f620257cdbeddcd6eacc19b8ead501329 2213 mailscripts_0.16-1~bpo10+1.dsc
2428c874d0bc6530b1428ac11506d359a7b4e491 4476 mailscripts_0.16-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
2b0adeecc5183347c4c42463cbd9ea4a6d9f008e7fb9f2f2f9180a106391aa53 2213 mailscripts_0.16-1~bpo10+1.dsc
175a9c26b56ab916da163c2a6fc668258d4110c9b03015ce56278cc7cd576c7d 4476 mailscripts_0.16-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
f49e05bf0ff9655696bb92349577cfb4 2213 mail optional mailscripts_0.16-1~bpo10+1.dsc
c566d0244613cde310f20ffaac2c4b39 4476 mail optional mailscripts_0.16-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=yDSQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: