Accepted fever 1.0.3-1~bpo9+1 (source amd64) into stretch-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 17:56:58 +0100
Source: fever
Binary: fever
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.3-1~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sascha Steinbiss <satta@debian.org>
Changed-By: Sascha Steinbiss <satta@debian.org>
Description:
fever - fast, extensible, versatile event router for Suricata's EVE-JSON
Changes:
fever (1.0.3-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for stretch-backports.
.
fever (1.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
* Add new dependency on golang-github-yl2chen-cidranger-dev.
* Bump Standards-Version.
* Use debhelper 12.
* Skip dwz for Golang binary.
Checksums-Sha1:
a6050c53008e84aa0830a91856b5733466454a55 2441 fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1.dsc
90397c90dc9c1e9c44b4033576ae68c09e6f42a5 3588 fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
d545b0e038d3223fe5754c6e2736ee4a88c0d741 9734 fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
88a0cf1ecfcc5cafc5e7490624e56c70f364191e 2361618 fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
ed4e8099fc13ef36ac9220ca1069c632114ffb06a485a72bf08581ea3fd4d2c1 2441 fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1.dsc
4f28f9978ddde45a50d7a12a8c5092e2854010db5b4004884762c74aa64c755c 3588 fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
ae8a9e87a249618e587bf6fbad6ef66c5d41171d3d71fc1e7b07b01d1d83a499 9734 fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
6fc50d88809deb5bfaee1725f97f88dea3f670a685cc580775b777ca1a785173 2361618 fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1_amd64.deb
Files:
9e1c97b5b3205ad2c5294e4d1fc7fdf8 2441 net optional fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1.dsc
87aa2dde1f2fc838dba2b050d03f5c72 3588 net optional fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
b3694b322c3db70b340258f02e64de7a 9734 net optional fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
506d17599653c30d127d61faea341c7e 2361618 net optional fever_1.0.3-1~bpo9+1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=1lO4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: