[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted lintian 2.5.117~bpo9+1 (source all) into stretch-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:39:00 +0000
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.117~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers <lintian-maint@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Description:
 lintian    - Debian package checker
Closes: 916021 916023 916087 916207
Changes:
 lintian (2.5.117~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for stretch-backports.
 .
 lintian (2.5.117) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Summary of tag changes:
     + Added:
       - file-references-package-build-path
 .
   * checks/files.pm:
     + [CL] Don't emit uses-dpkg-database-directly for d-i components; they
       likely know what they are doing with no alternatives.
     + [CL] Use the output from file(1) when determining whether to emit
       the package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files tag to catch packages
       that ship (for example) just a Python script under /usr/bin in an
       architecture-dependent package.  This reverts 6f4bd2fee2 in order to
       distinguish between "data" and such scripts.  Thanks to Dmitry
       Bogatov for investigating.  (Closes: #916023)
     + [CL] Refactor, tidy and optimise various checks for the contents of
       files.
     + [CL] Check files for references to the build path if specified in a
       .buildinfo.  (Closes: #916021
   * checks/shared-libs.desc:
     + [CL] Clarify that symbols-file-missing-build-depends-package-field is
       emitted per-package in its long description, not based on a file.
   * checks/systemd.pm:
     + [CL] Don't emit systemd-service-file-missing-hardening-features for
       Type=oneshot "services" such as mdadm(8).
   * checks/watch-file.desc:
     + [CL] Correct grammar of the debian-watch-does-not-check-gpg-signature
       tag description.
     + [CL] Mark debian-watch-does-not-check-gpg-signature as "experimental"
       as it is not actionable in the vast majority of cases and is in
       danger of diluting the output of Lintian.  (Closes: #916207)
 .
   * data/spelling/corrections:
     + [PW] Add a number of corrections.
 .
   * t/*:
     + [CL] Apply a patch series from Felix Lechner to use "skeletons" as
       test templates, fixing a "exec failed: Text file busy" regression
       when running tests by tag name.  (Closes: #916087)
     + [CL] Apply a patch series from Felix Lechner to improve the
       "onlyrun=" test selection feature.  One can now select all tests
       connected to particular Lintian check with "check:foo".  (MR: !90)
     + [CL] Apply a patch set from Felix Lechner to sign test packages.
       when a upstream/private-key.asc is present.  (MR: !93)
Checksums-Sha1:
 c87112492532f7847cc9ec0ec6bbe57a3566bbd6 3653 lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1.dsc
 5024feff66957b01c3f57c898ab78f4c005e4fb7 1623724 lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1.tar.xz
 7c82c795c01ebdc65901f5d09b87cd175bfe7262 1172142 lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1_all.deb
 63ea642603c97bb1c02d1746bbc922804365f423 8732 lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9dd6f331f6b58429c33bc2381fce2d8063f68fd2d4a6d33e65ce304a1fa78748 3653 lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1.dsc
 d060f9e8dcc835c0583a8e98ac3998b5ffaf1c7eae1ea7f17abe0e1af1eca056 1623724 lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1.tar.xz
 f7543b3bb2c54f24c158e69e0498ffe54d366471b9e1dc97c8715f897ad09557 1172142 lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1_all.deb
 834157e7456bfe1cfeda5c314995184d4b4f777770121bd18c9acf335146d7f4 8732 lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 d5a10a9e308cc038ea0def26e6402a5c 3653 devel optional lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1.dsc
 3df185353338335820068840ab98722b 1623724 devel optional lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1.tar.xz
 6339a01f18f2d03494f72fa237fe791f 1172142 devel optional lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1_all.deb
 678fbeb1b26fd7d091058af5e91464df 8732 devel optional lintian_2.5.117~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=adKH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: