[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted lintian 2.5.115~bpo9+1 (source all) into stretch-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 09:53:24 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.115~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers <lintian-maint@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Description:
 lintian    - Debian package checker
Closes: 914873 914885 914952
Changes:
 lintian (2.5.115~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for stretch-backports.
 .
 lintian (2.5.115) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Summary of tag changes:
     + Removed:
       - debian-rules-makemaker-prefix-is-deprecated
 .
   * checks/binaries.pm:
     + [CL] Allow packages to define an RPATH under /usr/lib/ghc/ as the
       Haskell team have their own scheme for this.  (Closes: #914873)
   * checks/rules.{desc,pm}:
     + [CL] Drop the debian-rules-makemaker-prefix-is-deprecated tag as the
       transition was completed in 2015.  Thanks to Niko Tyni for the
       update.  (Closes: #914885)
   * checks/patch-systems.desc:
     + [CL] Downgrade package-uses-vendor-specific-patch-series from "E:" to
       "W:" as they are not RC bugs until the release of buster.
 .
   * data/spelling/corrections:
     + [PW] Add a number of corrections.
 .
   * t/*:
     + [CL] Apply a patch series from Felix Lechner to implement a universal
       test runner with file-based default values.  (MR: !76)
   * t/runtests:
     + [CL] Apply a patch from Felix Lechner to fail tests with outdated
       specifications (ie. ./debian/debian exists).  (MR: !77)
   * t/tests/{binaries-missing-lfs,deb-format-udeb-compression}:
     + [CL] Apply a patch from Adam Conrad to fix two typos introduced
       when parameterising test architectures.  (Closes: #914952)
   * t/tests/files-multiarch-foreign-files:
     + [CL] Apply a patch from James Clarke to fix this test on non-amd64
       architectures.  (MR: !78)
Checksums-Sha1:
 318611e1639365be3db84d02a6a633788c7ea979 3615 lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1.dsc
 c31f146863523ce820bae940cc1e692dce41f3ca 1613500 lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1.tar.xz
 57c931a957eddb1965d2984eaf4075812ce11cda 1157322 lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1_all.deb
 416e078eefd3547da120542abab0ab0f45b87249 8731 lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 d7079823bbdfac67c9dd2bf3f6b84abcd08ff04b6ea6ddcab972b16935cfa531 3615 lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1.dsc
 42a4616be48b5a75d5931da46dbc95827f3263ed69e466040a57e296fa3a0be6 1613500 lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1.tar.xz
 7ed56c4545d5b4855b27fc0bed2cd795e98257b4eac081c52105d37006804cc3 1157322 lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1_all.deb
 5e95d628090614539106222078dbdc938fdac422b911b7894a0e9e270acf63e6 8731 lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 252924eb8173a9ef58d99f957739ef1a 3615 devel optional lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1.dsc
 8f45d6b80305224cedfbf1156a4fce7b 1613500 devel optional lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1.tar.xz
 e026e954e31970e21d85c058156138fa 1157322 devel optional lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1_all.deb
 174804769bba8d8c2406846faadce05f 8731 devel optional lintian_2.5.115~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5lXw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: