[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted haproxy 1.8.14-1~bpo9+1 (source) into stretch-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 17:54:10 +0100
Source: haproxy
Binary: haproxy haproxy-doc vim-haproxy
Architecture: source
Version: 1.8.14-1~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian HAProxy Maintainers <haproxy@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org>
Description:
 haproxy    - fast and reliable load balancing reverse proxy
 haproxy-doc - fast and reliable load balancing reverse proxy (HTML documentatio
 vim-haproxy - syntax highlighting for HAProxy configuration files
Changes:
 haproxy (1.8.14-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for stretch-backports.
Checksums-Sha1:
 7bb7aa53254d2396bfd6a3d1e7e0c3dc388bfda8 2315 haproxy_1.8.14-1~bpo9+1.dsc
 63c255050890e22906e08b82b7b0776a21a2278e 66324 haproxy_1.8.14-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
 8b4ad89179f85270e7b43d36c307edba968150ee 8167 haproxy_1.8.14-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 3ab1a2f440e105317dd588311c8f5697e225a43652ecd42053e0ce87e453a400 2315 haproxy_1.8.14-1~bpo9+1.dsc
 40587f08492bded0e4b94e0f7adfee5f501f2aa79ab14b27973efa1e69aa3767 66324 haproxy_1.8.14-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
 68e466b1254405990de5807d011d170be5728b4d2a1b02a74419587c4f0d1bcc 8167 haproxy_1.8.14-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 adf7f20924622d6b976398531cab9ebf 2315 net optional haproxy_1.8.14-1~bpo9+1.dsc
 612c76f7925386a525792d0c6c8c4a74 66324 net optional haproxy_1.8.14-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
 8801e4f28d68a1daa70eeb34c062b880 8167 net optional haproxy_1.8.14-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJGBAEBCAAwFiEErvI0h2bzccaJpzYAlaQv6DU1JfkFAlvV6uwSHGJlcm5hdEBk
ZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEJWkL+g1NSX5gesP/RINLXr7N1ZB1lAqLDlu9eCgFiF7PleK
sKphjlgFXfapj05z8r6chwH6Uwa4E0SrspYkxXChkD99OHjRsm9lPlT9Z6AVMJuL
ZwhzwBT3/X8oN9E75lf57dME0nRYTdipKC3T2SAv2qPGhFguYwo+KfeJXv/7JDLJ
Io1Kr8E4gV6XEM5Wp88oKAjVQSxoJS92WDvqZo0kqFuj0E845Sf4S5L42E4dEvRJ
lHjkx5xMGx8qEAMzg0/WXRBosRsho5XAzu1RBAtRwuoiyebHj1gyd6F4B9vrfm2u
eGNOm9RJ9MJWog54zgooYewM90CO7I1wQBPkJsRc2c3iCUhAcx4BgPq8Fi8zEv0s
2wrAts6qmy61ByVmzJpUdythUM5G1w3wna525q0W01IWV/7OpYLV3KsLX9IbLgtc
3VVn5uftahROgUeWf99Vx6YfJw6s3dmvUUU9yil5m0hnVGRbcgi7UFssdoHvAYA+
mmxTR3ofAqet72h2h9b2R7lRjLl8XDwtYtNge2Otu2Vw9OrBt4sqLs3uv4BuVqMN
tQdr0+WZCGgPe03E9qWo0Mz0Ap8qxqOa5vtrLnQI5ycEZHz6jMxiUTGEXCf1vtnJ
BwFEoo7o28LT3FKlAhmoSjzWGlOxRlv2TLUmMiMAluDEgsaQJF7VCtSWtxnjzZi5
AytBx056uT2t
=r2EV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: