Accepted dehydrated 0.6.1-2~bpo9+1 (source) into stretch-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 16:05:04 +0200
Source: dehydrated
Binary: dehydrated dehydrated-apache2
Architecture: source
Version: 0.6.1-2~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Let's Encrypt Team <team+letsencrypt@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>
Description:
dehydrated - ACME client implemented in Bash
dehydrated-apache2 - dehydrated challenge response support for Apache2
Closes: 896697
Changes:
dehydrated (0.6.1-2~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for stretch-backports.
.
dehydrated (0.6.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add patch from upstream to not duplicate the intermediate cert in the
fullchain.pem. Closes: #896697
* d/control:
+ Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4, no changes needed.
+ Update maintainer address to use the tracker.debian.org team.
Checksums-Sha1:
efd22c77e707a3cd0f87f5170c0c6253ed78652f 2336 dehydrated_0.6.1-2~bpo9+1.dsc
60205651b085e61c8893b7ab603f6fe9447fb33b 13116 dehydrated_0.6.1-2~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
5b15cde473076f8409882adfab5270af263a7c3f 6929 dehydrated_0.6.1-2~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
ee247928a5028950fa84db48753e452b4058150d0d7656412451a81ac6257ee7 2336 dehydrated_0.6.1-2~bpo9+1.dsc
909ba9a977c8d55c38c63a3f5dd6eec3c6d45207b7cbf379f325a5b9a6f3840c 13116 dehydrated_0.6.1-2~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
7ccc5cfb7a74e75c848bdf6149889620f0da07121d8480391540f46758e236f4 6929 dehydrated_0.6.1-2~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
2c880e49f9ce630ac9c0828482c52342 2336 misc optional dehydrated_0.6.1-2~bpo9+1.dsc
946303513830a382f0a0292763fc90a4 13116 misc optional dehydrated_0.6.1-2~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
729f6a3a237b61301a2c56de5a26afc3 6929 misc optional dehydrated_0.6.1-2~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=rZq5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: