Accepted dehydrated 0.5.0-2~bpo9+1 (source) into stretch-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 20:24:07 +0100
Source: dehydrated
Binary: dehydrated dehydrated-apache2
Architecture: source
Version: 0.5.0-2~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Let's Encrypt <letsencrypt-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>
Description:
dehydrated - ACME client implemented in Bash
dehydrated-apache2 - dehydrated challenge response support for Apache2
Changes:
dehydrated (0.5.0-2~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for stretch-backports.
.
dehydrated (0.5.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add patch from upstream to follow redirects on HTTP GET.
This fixes an error when creating the fullchain.pem after the LE API
introduced a new redirect.
Checksums-Sha1:
42450a86c03d1e833e4cdf4f30458d20ddee9f0e 2337 dehydrated_0.5.0-2~bpo9+1.dsc
486ebb812decb68b9a27f3f9a731ad6bde6308c4 11800 dehydrated_0.5.0-2~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
5a027f29d06c8d68cf6627823b717133ef228d1a 6915 dehydrated_0.5.0-2~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
a31341cad8d632777a070075b26853b15e61f5429eaf14ae247103ea30cc3fab 2337 dehydrated_0.5.0-2~bpo9+1.dsc
ffeb73f2055902a1311d93d308aabd3c61d268d87a669be42125c1830432294b 11800 dehydrated_0.5.0-2~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
04f205164d4e48934613b6e4c5d9ce4c6efb6054e896f6bae0c961bbf9e83172 6915 dehydrated_0.5.0-2~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
41caa2f38146d9b5202eb15e8a0efeb8 2337 misc optional dehydrated_0.5.0-2~bpo9+1.dsc
ac5a2c7acce615b1da594565a0d4720b 11800 misc optional dehydrated_0.5.0-2~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
7000b7682f89040c1043d28ba45937e0 6915 misc optional dehydrated_0.5.0-2~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=GJTd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: