[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gajim 1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1 (source all) into stretch-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:35:04 +0000
Source: gajim
Binary: gajim
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian XMPP Maintainers <pkg-xmpp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: W. Martin Borgert <debacle@debian.org>
Description:
 gajim      - GTK+-based Jabber client
Changes:
 gajim (1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild for stretch-backports.
Checksums-Sha1:
 ccd982a359221356119cffcd245e44a6526cc848 2187 gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1.dsc
 1e9a8d81c20c432f362be2ab7e8e204ff4c711a5 10000 gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
 34b1eb2c7b576e3ef81853863d9b4b416251ec23 2948390 gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1_all.deb
 1eb8c870361be0cdf3967ceae357a08c369af30a 10946 gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 7e062482c1439fa4f1f0da69b240546946b4d925465424d311469c424e421e1f 2187 gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1.dsc
 840cbe90b918c542f96ac1b4811017cd644a9157dc86512cd330f688d051f1ca 10000 gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
 dc6970ef5e803376b94ab71923a590bdac77ff8f28ebc065a0109a8576be8c72 2948390 gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1_all.deb
 361304dcbd7904d454235b936efffdc1fb64fbbcf5aefa530887d337985dc9fa 10946 gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 94e8c66a04e8599b5970bdc5ace492bb 2187 net optional gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1.dsc
 6fa55a0075be38640f80bb026f7ae633 10000 net optional gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
 2046a304f8d80fcddb165059ec82c52d 2948390 net optional gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1_all.deb
 787d3a9ea978802bcc299c944fc61ae0 10946 net optional gajim_1.0.0~beta1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=gqHk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: