Accepted ansible 2.4.0.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1 (source) into stretch-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 19:00:55 -0400
Source: ansible
Binary: ansible
Architecture: source
Version: 2.4.0.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieberman@debian.org>
Changed-By: Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieberman@debian.org>
Closes: 873890 874194 880596
Description:
ansible - Configuration management, deployment, and task execution system
Changes:
ansible (2.4.0.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for stretch-backports. (Closes: #880596)
.
ansible (2.4.0.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
* Remove 0002-fix-jinja-1.9-upgrade.patch, applied upstream.
.
ansible (2.3.2.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
* Remove 01-fix-htpasswd.patch, applied upstream.
* Upstream fixes:
- Fix --force for unversioned requirements (Closes: #874194)
- attempt to fix systemd in chroot env (Closes: 873890)
Checksums-Sha1:
d42eb19f0dc0c7920c9b49eb7c8d532f4ab13735 2266 ansible_2.4.0.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1.dsc
f7923c554843963018461cd17326e9854408fca0 16144 ansible_2.4.0.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
45003c5e60dbe2ecf358cf82764f381644fb72b0ee81e1c5ff8dd40f875093f0 2266 ansible_2.4.0.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1.dsc
9b523e78f35f7379d5692e3401358364ffdc6b8bdd6e943c1c9343c90b31af43 16144 ansible_2.4.0.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
609d5a8869e57c859cf565bcab0e80be 2266 admin optional ansible_2.4.0.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1.dsc
ca627d4de54761f45fc88bd520633c62 16144 admin optional ansible_2.4.0.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=OnYl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: