[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted bubblewrap 0.1.2-2~bpo8+1 (amd64 source) into jessie-backports



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 22:09:36 +0100
Source: bubblewrap
Binary: bubblewrap
Architecture: amd64 source
Version: 0.1.2-2~bpo8+1
Distribution: jessie-backports
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org>
Changed-By: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Closes: 840605
Description: 
 bubblewrap - setuid wrapper for unprivileged chroot and namespace manipulation
Changes:
 bubblewrap (0.1.2-2~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=high
 .
   * Rebuild for jessie-backports
     - debian/gbp.conf: adjust for this branch
 .
 bubblewrap (0.1.2-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Revert addition of --set-hostname as a short-term fix for
     CVE-2016-8659 (Closes: #840605)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 8a7d7294b738923b6d9657c8914ad1ed61a71cb6 2099 bubblewrap_0.1.2-2~bpo8+1.dsc
 6a8e1503ef53e945bc450ff851df8fbd6bbdfd0b 5756 bubblewrap_0.1.2-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 efa7e747a2797f57c32d4f5babdcf4df68fcc5d5 25322 bubblewrap_0.1.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 078dc899e91da34807716820e9a7d86dfdfbb185540c545750289319f13e59b4 2099 bubblewrap_0.1.2-2~bpo8+1.dsc
 4b00061ae831723fd76a867e256366523c4a6dc3b9d8331259ae9791ccdb89b5 5756 bubblewrap_0.1.2-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 1d74fef56bf10221efb85ee009e944c44981d08f8cf45d0bca953b80fe19e88c 25322 bubblewrap_0.1.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 94c5a3ec0e681598af845483724a7955 2099 admin optional bubblewrap_0.1.2-2~bpo8+1.dsc
 093a0100e0a9f3eabf64fb41ffec5179 5756 admin optional bubblewrap_0.1.2-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 fd57b0048ce5f7568924c54e01022cd3 25322 admin optional bubblewrap_0.1.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=GVTp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: