Accepted adequate 0.12~bpo70+1 (source all) into wheezy-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:10:33 +0200
Source: adequate
Binary: adequate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.12~bpo70+1
Distribution: wheezy-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Changed-By: Holger Levsen <holger@debian.org>
Description:
adequate - Debian package quality testing tool
Changes:
adequate (0.12~bpo70+1) wheezy-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for wheezy-backports.
* Add myself to uploaders.
.
adequate (0.12) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Exclude /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/lib2to3/tests/data/ and
/usr/lib/pythonX.Y/test/bad* from byte-compilation checks.
* Check for collisions between executables and bash builtin commands.
* Use HTTPS URLs when they are available, in documentation and code.
* Simplify error handling.
* Test suite: fix compatibility with dpkg (>= 1.17.7).
Checksums-Sha1:
f7f72608015b83138cf81c84886db4e925280326 1676 adequate_0.12~bpo70+1.dsc
694054f0c6996e027d7cf711ed467dff85d1c931 30345 adequate_0.12~bpo70+1.tar.gz
7c4715f56a349f7b7ba6b52058952f42bca4dc68 25312 adequate_0.12~bpo70+1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
a95852c8cdce0b61389e27a701193d5b8bc70d2a131c491f03adadcf6a51852b 1676 adequate_0.12~bpo70+1.dsc
0a251d236be482b9170c551d09fed48ce68e5f5141086f3f4cff751ea26bfb19 30345 adequate_0.12~bpo70+1.tar.gz
0fa73db02ab502f90f800c6dbbc75413802443cc355b96b61d33f58ca191fbb8 25312 adequate_0.12~bpo70+1_all.deb
Files:
888334fb456c9ebd79301ecc1fdbed41 1676 utils optional adequate_0.12~bpo70+1.dsc
adacab63d3e8c915f04365ffe3ee020d 30345 utils optional adequate_0.12~bpo70+1.tar.gz
917f90e6a7fbf8bad7ae65b2a34be1c6 25312 utils optional adequate_0.12~bpo70+1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=1qX0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: