[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

python-django_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into squeeze-backports





Accepted:
python-django-doc_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1_all.deb
  to main/p/python-django/python-django-doc_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1_all.deb
python-django_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/p/python-django/python-django_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1.debian.tar.gz
python-django_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1.dsc
  to main/p/python-django/python-django_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1.dsc
python-django_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1_all.deb
  to main/p/python-django/python-django_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1_all.deb
python-django_1.4.2.orig.tar.gz
  to main/p/python-django/python-django_1.4.2.orig.tar.gz


Changes:
python-django (1.4.2-1~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low
 .
  * Rebuild for squeeze-backports (no changes).
 .
python-django (1.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
  * New upstream security and maintenance release. Closes: #691145
    Fixes: CVE-2012-4520
  * Drop 01_use_stdlib_htmlparser_when_possible.diff which has been
    merged upstream.
 .
python-django (1.4.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * New patch 01_use_stdlib_htmlparser_when_possible.diff to not override
    Python stdlib's HTMLParser with Python versions which are unaffected by
    http://bugs.python.org/issue670664 Closes: #683648
    Thanks to David Watson <david@planetwatson.co.uk> for the patch.
  * Update the above patch to use the version committed upstream (commit
    57d9ccc).
 .
python-django (1.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * New upstream security and maintenance release. Closes: #683364
    Fixes: CVE-2012-3442 CVE-2012-3443 CVE-2012-3444
  * Drop 01_disable_broken_test.diff and 04_hyphen-manpage.diff which
    have been merged upstream.


Override entries for your package:
python-django-doc_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1_all.deb - optional doc
python-django_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1.dsc - source python
python-django_1.4.2-1~bpo60+1_all.deb - optional python

Announcing to debian-backports-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to backports.debian.org archive.


Reply to: