[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

ruby-minitest_2.9.1-1~bpo60+1_amd64.changes is NEW



(new) ruby-minitest_2.9.1-1~bpo60+1.debian.tar.gz optional ruby
(new) ruby-minitest_2.9.1-1~bpo60+1.dsc optional ruby
(new) ruby-minitest_2.9.1-1~bpo60+1_all.deb optional ruby
Ruby test tools supporting TDD, BDD, mocking, and benchmarking
 minitest provides a complete suite of testing facilities supporting
 TDD, BDD, mocking, and benchmarking.
 .
 minitest/unit is a small and incredibly fast unit testing framework.
 It provides a rich set of assertions to make your tests clean and
 readable.
 .
 minitest/spec is a functionally complete spec engine. It hooks onto
 minitest/unit and seamlessly bridges test assertions over to spec
 expectations.
 .
 minitest/benchmark is an awesome way to assert the performance of your
 algorithms in a repeatable manner. Now you can assert that your newb
 co-worker doesn't replace your linear algorithm with an exponential
 one!
 .
 minitest/mock by Steven Baker, is a beautifully tiny mock object
 framework.
 .
 minitest/pride shows pride in testing and adds coloring to your test
 output.
 .
 minitest/unit is meant to have a clean implementation for language
 implementors that need a minimal set of methods to bootstrap a working
 test suite. For example, there is no magic involved for test-case
 discovery.
(new) ruby-minitest_2.9.1.orig.tar.gz optional ruby


Changes:
ruby-minitest (2.9.1-1~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low
 .
  * Backport to squeeze-backports.
  * Add myself to Uploaders.


Override entries for your package:

Announcing to debian-backports-changes@lists.debian.org


Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file.  It is ok otherwise, so please be patient.  New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.

You may have gotten the distribution wrong.  You'll get warnings above
if files already exist in other distributions.
e
if files already exist in other distributions.


Reply to: