[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted keepalived 1.1.15-1~bpo40+1 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:35:29 +0000
Source: keepalived
Binary: keepalived
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.15-1~bpo40+1
Distribution: etch-backports
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>
Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>
Description: 
 keepalived - Failover and monitoring daemon for LVS clusters
Closes: 401827 401827 428927
Changes: 
 keepalived (1.1.15-1~bpo40+1) etch-backports; urgency=low
 .
   * Rebuild for etch-backports.
 .
 keepalived (1.1.15-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes: #401827)
   * Remove 00_fix-manpagepath.patch and
     01_fix-genhash-manpagepath.patch(obsolete)
   * Bump standards version
 .
 keepalived (1.1.13-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes: #401827)
   * Add patch to compile with libc6-dev. Thanks to Cyril Brulebois
     for the original patch (Closes: #428927)
Files: 
 db6395bed35f151ed487f3e334bae3cd 656 admin optional keepalived_1.1.15-1~bpo40+1.dsc
 4c93f5d8b6bfabe84b02828a5bbb7aa0 227003 admin optional keepalived_1.1.15.orig.tar.gz
 be02c4be5a8fe886f83d5c15128a9139 53709 admin optional keepalived_1.1.15-1~bpo40+1.diff.gz
 eb4bad6a06c92419717b88c5c2191c5e 120920 admin optional keepalived_1.1.15-1~bpo40+1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkjA/pYACgkQ01u8mbx9Agop0wCgivVAMzozowxiL6qOff9tU53M
BZcAnj+WIsDoBO5cup1pNlmPDk/oWgB+
=hrdn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
keepalived_1.1.15-1~bpo40+1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/keepalived/keepalived_1.1.15-1~bpo40+1.diff.gz
keepalived_1.1.15-1~bpo40+1.dsc
  to pool/main/k/keepalived/keepalived_1.1.15-1~bpo40+1.dsc
keepalived_1.1.15-1~bpo40+1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/keepalived/keepalived_1.1.15-1~bpo40+1_i386.deb
keepalived_1.1.15.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/keepalived/keepalived_1.1.15.orig.tar.gz


Reply to: