[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: Should munipack 0.5.13 be uploaded?
To
: Filip Hroch <
hroch@physics.muni.cz
>
Cc
:
debian-astro@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: Should munipack 0.5.13 be uploaded?
From
: Nilesh Patra <
npatra974@gmail.com
>
Date
: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:18:52 +0530
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
CAJN1929+VarpganbdOLHqBc2+CoNB3mqQAZNG-n3BXmQYq4n_g@mail.gmail.com
>
In-reply-to
: <87h7mumvit.fsf@localhost>
References
: <87lfc96w44.fsf@localhost> <
[🔎]
459e6a67-452c-bf61-5c2a-120c2bcb9b5a@debian.org
> <87h7mumvit.fsf@localhost>
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 19:17, Filip Hroch <
hroch@physics.muni.cz
> wrote:
Hi Nilesh,
yes, I've fixed them already on i386.
I'll need a time for some testing under armhf.
Looks like you made a new upstream(0.5.14) release. Should I update and upload?
Nilesh
Reply to:
debian-astro@lists.debian.org
Nilesh Patra (on-list)
Nilesh Patra (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Should munipack 0.5.13 be uploaded?
From:
Filip Hroch <hroch@physics.muni.cz>
Re: Should munipack 0.5.13 be uploaded?
From:
Filip Hroch <hroch@physics.muni.cz>
References
:
Re: Should munipack 0.5.13 be uploaded?
From:
Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org>
Prev by Date:
Re: Neat 2.3-1 ready for upload.
Next by Date:
Re: Should munipack 0.5.13 be uploaded?
Previous by thread:
Re: Should munipack 0.5.13 be uploaded?
Next by thread:
Re: Should munipack 0.5.13 be uploaded?
Index(es):
Date
Thread