Re: backport python-astropy for jessie?
- To: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
- Cc: Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org>, debian-astro@lists.debian.org, Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>
- Subject: Re: backport python-astropy for jessie?
- From: "Leo P. Singer" <leo.singer@ligo.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 01:18:40 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 8454968E-7811-4342-B54E-7CF6DFA0D372@ligo.org>
- In-reply-to: <20170126092153.GC3645@an3as.eu>
- References: <B5DFD4E6-779F-406F-B650-9541BA99718E@ligo.org> <97015b28-f7f2-491f-3ce1-7dffda33cf54@debian.org> <E4E4C4E8-6AE7-4A12-A3CA-FE5E29F03698@ligo.org> <7d2498a4-63d7-546d-9bee-c85463ecfe8c@debian.org> <C31964F9-B3C7-42C3-834F-0052B8DE3683@ligo.org> <98FD73DB-F9E6-4A6B-AA7B-FEC9C3AF4ED1@ligo.org> <EAD97D06-FDB8-4E99-8A62-5C241F01B733@ligo.org> <af28c1f5-b7b6-c5c3-63c3-33c1a39b5005@debian.org> <20170126080537.GA3645@an3as.eu> <3b7356d0-174f-c294-aedf-1f24b095ebe7@debian.org> <20170126092153.GC3645@an3as.eu>
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 4:21 AM, Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:00:43AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>> I admit I'm not very motivated to sponsor backports. I somehow need to
>>> draw a line what I can do and what not. However, I'd recommend to read
>>> the backport guidelines. As far as I remember its not necessary to be
>>> a DD but rather to get accepted by the backport team.
>>
>> We don't have a specific policy for Debian Astro and mainly use the
>> Debian Science policy as a guide (and I insist in using git).
>
> May be it makes sense to copy the Backporting paragraph to Debian
> Science.
>
>> So, it
>> would probably wise to follow Debian-Meds guide to put the backports
>> into a "jessie-backports" branch of the reporitories, and to follow
>> https://backports.debian.org/Contribute/
>
> The branch is actually called
>
> debian/jessie-backports
>
> we used only jessie-backports but somebody raised some good arguments
> (which I forgot) to prefix it with debian/.
Hi Andreas,
Git will not let me name the branch 'debian/jessie-backports' because there is already a branch called 'debian':
$ git branch -m debian/jessie-backports
error: 'refs/heads/debian' exists; cannot create 'refs/heads/debian/jessie-backports'
fatal: Branch rename failed
Apparently, it is a known issue with git that you cannot create a branch 'foo/bar' if branch 'foo' exists:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22630404/git-push-refs-heads-my-subbranch-exists-cannot-create
Since it looks like most debian-astro packages have a 'debian' branch rather than 'master', is it OK if for debian-astro we instead adopt the practice that backports go in the 'jessie-backports' branch?
Thanks,
Leo
Reply to: