Re: Request for Rawtran packaging review
- To: debian-astro@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Request for Rawtran packaging review
- From: Filip Hroch <hroch@physics.muni.cz>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 23:24:59 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1459805099.4406.12.camel@physics.muni.cz>
- In-reply-to: <ytz4mbmka33.fsf@news.ole.ath.cx>
- References: <1457653562.9671.8.camel@physics.muni.cz> <87fuvx1lmg.fsf@debian.org> <1457949577.16773.19.camel@physics.muni.cz> <ytz7fh5nylp.fsf@news.ole.ath.cx> <1459367630.6753.4.camel@physics.muni.cz> <87h9fnkt5h.fsf@debian.org> <1459432465.374.15.camel@physics.muni.cz> <ytz4mbmka33.fsf@news.ole.ath.cx>
Hi Ole,
many thanks you for your tips.
I added both kinds (build and CI) of the tests. Now,
I see that the idea wasn't so good because there are
no small CR2 files due to the race of manufacturers
about mega-pixels.
I've problem with interaction of uscan and my
ftp (vsftpd). The list of files (uscan --debug)
is sometimes empty with no reason. This is the
problem reported also on QA pages.
Please, check the latest changes.
Thank you very much.
FH
--
F. Hroch e-mail, jabber: hroch@physics.muni.cz, tel.: +420549494470
Dept. of theor. physics and astrophysics, MU Brno, Kotlarska 2,CZ-611 37
Reply to: