Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline
- To: "Aaro Koskinen" <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
- Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, "Richard Earnshaw" <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>, "Richard Sandiford" <richard.sandiford@arm.com>, "Ramana Radhakrishnan" <ramanara@nvidia.com>, "Nicolas Pitre" <nico@fluxnic.net>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>, "Kristoffer Ericson" <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>, "Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>, "Janusz Krzysztofik" <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>, "Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>, Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, "Nikita Shubin" <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>, "Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>, "Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>, "Jeremy J. Peper" <jeremy@jeremypeper.com>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>, "Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
- Subject: Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline
- From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 14:53:48 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 0ca5b09d-13f6-4ea8-8a25-a189f1875a75@app.fastmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20240801182313.GD47080@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi>
- References: <2831c5a6-cfbf-4fe0-b51c-0396e5b0aeb7@app.fastmail.com> <20240731191332.GB47080@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> <[🔎] ea475f27-af7c-4060-bff7-a78389174236@app.fastmail.com> <20240801182313.GD47080@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024, at 20:23, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 10:59:38AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> Would the timing make any difference to you? I.e. does it help
>> to keep another year or two, or would dropping it in early 2025
>> be the same?
>
> Early 2025 could come too soon, but anyway during 2025 sounds OK. Let's
> see if anyone else has comments. At least one more LTS release where it
> has been tested would be nice.
To be clear: with "early 2025" I meant after the next LTS release
(6.12 as it seems), but one LTS later (early 2026) is still a
good outlook.
>> Ok, noted. Since you are doing the testing, that at least means
>> we have a chance of cleaning up the code gradually towards using
>> DT. Dmitry has started a migration of platform_data towards
>> DT compatible device properties, which can be done gradually
>> for the 22 platform drivers you use. This unfortunately still
>> leaves the nonstandard dmaengine interface (for UDC), but we
>> can deal with that later.
>
> I have some plans to work on that. There's a long-standing bug with 15xx
> DMA, but I have gotten that working, just need send those fixes out. After
> that the conversion to new dmaengine should be more straightforward,
> as we have a working testable reference for both boards using the UDC.
Nice, that does give a realistic hope of eventually doing a full
DT conversion then. If we manage to do both the DMA engine and
the device properties work, I would hope that writing an equivalent
dts file gets fairly easy.
Arnd
Reply to: