[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and armhf


On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:21:46 +0200 Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> wrote:
Dear arm porters,
can you please take a look at this?

Ping from the Release Team. This package is a key package (so the RC bug can't be "fixed" by removal from testing).

Am 15.04.22 um 21:19 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> Source: exempi
> Version: 2.5.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Control: close -1 2.6.1-1
> Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: out-of-sync
> > Dear maintainer(s), > > The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing > and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in > testing [1]. Your package src:exempi has been trying to migrate for 61 > days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. You package failed to build from > source on armel and armhf where it built successfully in the past. > > If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer > period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be > fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on > other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. > Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or > its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that > hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner. > > This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new > bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. > > I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if > that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect > testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bookworm, so > it doesn't affect (old-)stable. > > If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to > issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. > > Paul > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg00005.html
> [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=exempi


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: