[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Performance degraded, Bookworm on Raspberry Pi 4B



I tested this morning with an install on an SD card and the disk benchmarks were not significantly different. The updated `raspi-firmware` did seem to result in slightly slower performance (7188 events before and 6525 after) but I attribute this to a low CPU clock rather than a problem with the SD card driver. Details at https://github.com/HankB/Pi-4B-bookworm-performance#2022-03-15-testing-with-sd-card.

I'll be happy to file the  bug reports. https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/issues/1705

Debian BTS next.

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 9:02 AM Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 March 2022 13:32:37 CET Hank Barta wrote:
> Some additional information that might be useful is that the system seems
> unable to determine CPU frequencies. For example
>
> root@up:~# cpupower frequency-info
> analyzing CPU 0:
>   no or unknown cpufreq driver is active on this CPU
>   CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: Not Available
>   CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: Not
> Available
>   maximum transition latency:  Cannot determine or is not supported.
> Not Available
>   available cpufreq governors: Not Available
>   Unable to determine current policy
>   current CPU frequency: Unable to call hardware
>   current CPU frequency:  Unable to call to kernel

I lack the knowledge to properly/fully understand the issue Gunnar linked to,
but it looks applicable ... still (despite the last msg indicating the issue
was fixed).
I don't know exactly the role that clocks play, but they seem quite important.
And when the value of a/multiple clock(s) return 0, it doesn't surprise me
that it would cause other things to fail, like the ones you reported above,
which in turn cause the CPU (f.e.) to be way slower then it can be.

Personally I think it's more useful if Hank reported the issue himself to
https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/ then let Gunnar do it on his behalf.

Having a bug in Debian's BTS (against raspi-firmware) regarding this issue
seems useful as well and with the 'forwarded' keyword it can be linked to the
upstream issue.

Cheers,
  Diederik


--
Beautiful Sunny Winfield

Reply to: