Quoting Dominique Dumont (2020-02-16 19:15:21) > On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 14:16:22 CET Dominique Dumont wrote: > > This is promising: > > > > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-March/249735.html > > Or not :-( > > With this setup (and no GMAC_TX_DELAY), the network starts fine on rev Olimex > LIME2 rev G.2 but not on rev K. Any news on proposing your bugfix to mainline u-boot, Dominique? Wiki page https://linux-sunxi.org/Olimex_A20-OLinuXino-Lime2#GMAC_quirks now updated to cover the knowledge shared here and other places I could locate. How did you reach the value "3" for the bugfix? Did you test multiple values or followed advice from somewhere and could confirm that it was an improvement? Reason I ask is that the only places I could find that specific value was at the wiki page and here in this bugreport, and (as I have now clarified) the information seems to not be well tested and is different from what Olimex use in their fork of u-boot. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature