[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: AtomicCounter::is_always_lock_free on armel



On 06/11/2019 10:47, rene.engelhard@mailbox.org wrote:
Am 6. November 2019 09:26:53 MEZ schrieb Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>:
, you could add an appropriate #if/else
(with
a useful comment) around the definition of AtomicCounter and the
accompanying static_assert.

Can do, yes, although I would like it more if it was fine upstream...

That's what I meant, provide an upstream commit.

(And address any resulting -Wvolatile on
armel as appropriate for your needs.)

As it (is it?) only a warning one can also just ignore it ;-)

Yes, that's likely all you need to do to address it appropriately for your needs.


Reply to: