On 25.09.2018 05:18, peter green wrote:
On 23/09/18 15:20, LinAdmin wrote:
Peter, you are right, I should have written "looks broken".
The time stamp in the bottom sentence is misleading and imho should be updated even when no new messages arrived.
The main reason why I started watching arises from the fact that I had started a new thread a day before which was never published. For the same text resent later I got the confirmation from postfix:<firstname.lastname@example.org>: delivery via
bendel.debian.org[126.96.36.199]:25: 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 62C9719Abut it was not published either. So I am curious if this message will be published.
Many thanks and my apologies to those members of the list who have been disturbed...