Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?
On 11/07/2017 11:08 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
That's not clear to me at all. Keeping armel on life support for 2 more
years is a significant drain on DSA and our hosters, for questionable
benefit.
I think a possible solution is the plan we had inside Debian Ports which is
to introduce a Britney instance within Debian Ports and hence be able to
provide a Debian testing release.
My dream would be to not to have the distinction between release architectures
and ports architectures, but rather something like Tier I and Tier II
architectures with the Tier II architectures sharing the characteristics of
the Tier I architectures but without any support and without the buildds
and porterboxes being maintained by DSA.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Reply to: