On 2016-10-11 08:16 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > Seems to me that the issue is probably actually in gdal, rather > > than postgis, although why the configure behaviour has changd > > remains a mystery. > > The configure behaviour is weird indeed. On the other architectures > "none required" remains the result for this test. I looked at the actual configure stuff for this and couldn't really grok when that came out as the result. > The CryptoPP symbols seem to have changed with the recent update of > libcrypto++ from 5.6.3-8 to 5.6.4-1. Which did not create this problem > on the other architectures though. > > Perhaps rebuilding gdal with the new libcrypto++ on arm64 will be > sufficient to fix this issue? That seems quite likely. It might just be the senstivity of C++ symbols to compiler changes. Unfortunately so far as I know one can't test such a thing on the porter boxes (because there is no way to unstall the local gdal you just built due to lack of root rights). So I have got my local arm64 box going again and will test this theory tomorrow (home time now). Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature