Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#820220: Bug#820220: Bug#820220: Bug#820220: julia: FTBFS on armel/armhf
On 8 April 2016 at 21:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
> Why did you switch to 3.8? The default in unstable is 3.6 and in experimental is
> 3.7.
I understood there were severe performance regressions with Julia on
LLVM > 3.3 that were only fixed in 3.8.
> I'm Cc'ing the arm and llvm lists, maybe they can give some hints.
Thanks.
I did ask on #debian-arm earlier today and was given some pointers by
suihkulokki.
Firstly, llvm-toolchain-3.8 hasn't actually built on armel yet [1], so
the julia build on armel is being attempted with llvm
1:3.8~svn247576-1 from llvm-toolchain-snapshot.
Secondly, it should be possible to reproduce the fault by building in
an armhf schroot on abel.d.o, which has the same hardware as the
buildds. A temporary solution would be to upload armhf binaries built
on asachi.d.o.
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.8&suite=unstable
Reply to: