[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: marvell_cesa continues to fail on kirkwood with kernel 4.4



On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> wrote:
> * JM <fijam@archlinux.us> [2016-02-05 04:20]:
>> To quickly bring you up to speed, the driver for Marvell's hardware
>> crypto accelerator embedded in their Armada/Kirkwood SoCs has been
>> rewritten as marvell_cesa and merged in kernel 4.2. The new driver
>> received a number of patches since and has been enabled in Debian as
>> a module in 4.4~rc4-1~exp1 (debian bug #807634), coexisting with the
>> old driver (mv_cesa).
>
> I think it would be best if you directly repoted this to
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> and copied:
> Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Arnaud Ebalard <arno@natisbad.org>
> Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
>
> --
> Martin Michlmayr
> http://www.cyrius.com/

Update:

I reported the issue to upstream [1] but they cannot replicate it on
their hardware. I've built a vanilla 4.4.1 kernel using Debian's
.config as explained in [2] and the module still fails in the same
fashion.

For an independent confirmation, I'd appreciate if someone with a
Kirkwood device (preferably a QNAP) could test the 4.4 kernel from
experimental and try the following:

rmmod mv_cesa
modprobe marvell_cesa allhwsupport=1
dmesg | tail -n 1

I've been asked to build a vanilla kernel again using .config provided
by Arnaud Ebalard for ReadyNAS Duo [3], but it ends up being too large
to fit in QNAP's 2MB mtd kernel partition, and I am also not sure if
it will work with the Debian userland, or which drivers I need to
enable for the QNAP to work properly (flash, rtc?), any hints would be
appreciated.

Best regards,
Jan

1 http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-February/thread.html#405279
2 http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s-kernel-org-package
3 http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-February/405530.html


Reply to: