On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 09:29:39 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 11:48:54 +0100 > > Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 10:32:46 +0100 > > > Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk> wrote: > > > > Why ISOs BTW? They don't seem all that typical on ARM systems, > > > > > > As a route to the default packaged ARMMP kernel. > > > > ... and because some boards still don't tftp boot in a sane way > > (imx53). i.e. there is no bootz command on the u-boot I have on the > > imx53 by default. > > I've been enabling things like bootz and ext4 support in recently > added boards in Debian's u-boot, I can look into enabling for the > mx53loco board if that would be helpful, although it sounds like > you're using whatever u-boot is shipped with the boards? Yes, LAVA needs clearer support for the bootloader itself, but in my home lab I'm free to change bootloaders around. When you say Debian's u-boot, how are you anticipating that to be deployed on the imx53? Are you describing the u-boot inside the Debian Installer ISO images or a particular build/package of u-boot for iMX53? -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature