On 2014-11-15, Rainer Dorsch <ml@bokomoko.de> wrote: > On Saturday 15 November 2014 11:51:05 Karsten Merker wrote: > What is the difference between u-boot-spl.bin and SPL in ... > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 31744 Nov 2 01:32 SPL > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 302872 Nov 2 01:32 uboot.elf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 236248 Nov 2 01:32 u-boot.img > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25665 Nov 2 01:32 u-boot-spl.bin SPL is the u-boot-spl.bin with some headers added, last I looked. I don't know if u-boot-spl.bin is useful itself. > So far I always used SPL which worked for me: > > blackbox:~# dd if=/mnt/tmp/usr/lib/u-boot/mx6_cubox-i/SPL of=/dev/sdX bs=1K > seek=1 > blackbox:~# dd if=/mnt/tmp/usr/lib/u-boot/mx6_cubox-i/u-boot.img of=/dev/sdX > bs=1K seek=42 Yup, that looks right. You definitely want to dd the SPL file. >> Regarding the hd-media support: as Vagrant wrote that he has >> patched some support for the new common u-boot bootcmd handling >> into the i.MX6 u-boot.img in sid, this should hopefully work, but >> due to lack of i.MX6 hardware I have never tested that. It's essentially emulates the config_distro_bootcmd.h by setting the same variables to appropriate values. Long-term, I'd like to see these platforms actually switch over fully... live well, vagrant
Attachment:
pgpdTlS35PdKh.pgp
Description: PGP signature