Re: Add new armhf flavor armada370xp
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:27:42AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:09:11AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:22:23PM +0000, peter green wrote:
>> >>Each flavor of armel and armhf should have the same function, too.
>> >IMO if you think you can support all armada series devices that are
>> >likely to run debian armhf from one kernel flavour then you should
>> >just call the flavour "armada" (similar to the way the flavour that
>> >covers beagle/panda/etc is just called "omap")
>
>> Definitely, yes. Hopefully in the longer term we'll be able to run
>> more of the ARMv7+ machines with single kernels using DT, but that's
>> not going to happen overnight.
>
>I hope we could be more ambitious and enter the single zImage /
>multiplatform setup early. We could start by simply calling the
>armada370 / armadaxp flavour "multiplatform". And then any new
>architectures would only be added by including them to multiplatform
>flavour - and only accepted if adding doesn't break existing platforms
>supported by our multiplatform kernel.
Good point, yes. Anybody object to that?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
Is there anybody out there?
Reply to: