Re: Bug#703209: linux: Please Add multiplatform flavour to armhf
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 03:46 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 08:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> [...]
> > > In future all ARM kernels should be multi-platform, but I expect there
> > > will still be different flavours, such as for LPAE or the RT featureset.
> > > I would much prefer a name that will provide a more useful distinction
> > > in future (and not be too long!). Perhaps it should refer to the CPU
> > > requirement like the flavours for some other architectures.
> >
> > I see. Although it is very simple, how is "armmp"?
> [...]
>
> Sounds alright to be, but let's allow the other ARM porters a few more
> days to comment.
'MP' has some history as meaning multi-processor, so might be confusing.
(But perhaps not confusing to many.)
--
Tixy
Reply to: